A few personal ideas about security updates:
- There are of course priorities in security issues management, not all bugs are first class ones.
- Security auditing is a slow process and not always upstreams are able to provide fast and decent fixes. A partial fix is not so better than a full one.
- I don't know if our secteams use a tracking system off list, with task lists and assignments. It's definitively a good thing to do that, just in case, and maintainers should be able to submit patches and reports to it. One could think we should use BTS for that. I don't think BTS is the most useful tracking system for security, and in some cases things cannot be published before fixes (yes I know, non full disclosures are evil, don't hide problems, etc. but I think responsible reports are better).
- A good number of issues are not tracked on BTS. I personally use rarely BTS for security, even for full disclosed issues, when they are not so known (no CANs, no official reports by upstreams, etc.). There are also issues known only by upstreams and me, sometimes. In those cases I only send e-mail to secteams.
