I'm still waiting some clarificatons by HDF team about their HDF5 roadmap with SONAMEs and libraries name. It seems they partially learned to manage libtool properly to follow C API changes, but still some oddities are present, such as using the same names for MPI and serial flavors. I will probably have to again diverge from upstream names, which is generally something I don't like, as in the case of GDAL. A summary document about HDF5 plans is due in a brief also.
When finished with HDF updates, I will concentrate on a couple of new beasts which still are lacking in DebianGis and are of so much interest, that are Ossim and the CNES Orfeo Toolbox. In the meantime I would hope that debian-science team will define a squeeze-related policy for MPI.
As always, I'm still worried of the low level of activities in the DebianGis team, which is a constant since years. Unfortunately, this is a situation I see quite common also in many other teams, but I still don't see a right way to improve the status of the team to avoid an almost one-man show. Also I would like to see again Qgis in main, but I'm still waiting for feed-backs by past/current contributors to my last qgis-dev list and off-lists polls.
Monday, April 06, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
